TY - JOUR
T1 - Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
AU - Nieto Ruiz, Adoración
AU - Livovsky, Dan M.
AU - Azpiroz Vidaur, Fernando
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/5/9
Y1 - 2023/5/9
N2 - Background. Meal ingestion induces a postprandial experience that involves homeostatic and hedonic sensations. Our aim was to determine the effect of aversive conditioning on the postprandial reward of a comfort meal. Methods: A sham-controlled, randomised, parallel, single-blind study was performed on 12 healthy women (6 per group). A comfort meal was tested before and after coupling the meal with an aversive sensation (conditioning intervention), induced by infusion of lipids via a thin naso-duodenal catheter; in the pre- and post-conditioning tests and in the control group, a sham infusion was performed. Participants were instructed that two recipes of a tasty humus would be tested; however, the same meal was administered with a colour additive in the conditioning and post-conditioning tests. Digestive well-being (primary outcome) was measured every 10 min before and 60 min after ingestion using graded scales. Results: In the aversive conditioning group, the comfort meal in the pre-conditioning test induced a pleasant postprandial experience, which was significantly lower in the post-conditioning test; the effect of aversive conditioning (change from pre- to post-conditioning) was significant as compared to sham conditioning in the control group, which showed no differences between study days. Conclusion: The hedonic postprandial response to a comfort meal in healthy women is impaired by aversive conditioning. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04938934.
AB - Background. Meal ingestion induces a postprandial experience that involves homeostatic and hedonic sensations. Our aim was to determine the effect of aversive conditioning on the postprandial reward of a comfort meal. Methods: A sham-controlled, randomised, parallel, single-blind study was performed on 12 healthy women (6 per group). A comfort meal was tested before and after coupling the meal with an aversive sensation (conditioning intervention), induced by infusion of lipids via a thin naso-duodenal catheter; in the pre- and post-conditioning tests and in the control group, a sham infusion was performed. Participants were instructed that two recipes of a tasty humus would be tested; however, the same meal was administered with a colour additive in the conditioning and post-conditioning tests. Digestive well-being (primary outcome) was measured every 10 min before and 60 min after ingestion using graded scales. Results: In the aversive conditioning group, the comfort meal in the pre-conditioning test induced a pleasant postprandial experience, which was significantly lower in the post-conditioning test; the effect of aversive conditioning (change from pre- to post-conditioning) was significant as compared to sham conditioning in the control group, which showed no differences between study days. Conclusion: The hedonic postprandial response to a comfort meal in healthy women is impaired by aversive conditioning. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04938934.
KW - Pavlovian conditioning
KW - Aversive conditioning
KW - Eating behaviour
KW - Digestive sensations
KW - Postprandial symptoms
KW - Digestive well-being
KW - Food valence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160304365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/90446512-5fce-385f-be10-b43936dcff65/
U2 - 10.3390/nu15102247
DO - 10.3390/nu15102247
M3 - Article
C2 - 37242129
SN - 2072-6643
VL - 15
JO - Nutrients
JF - Nutrients
IS - 10
M1 - 2247
ER -