TY - JOUR
T1 - Colonic J-Pouch or Straight Colorectal Reconstruction after Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
T2 - Impact on Quality of Life and Bowel Function: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study
AU - Gavaruzzi, Teresa
AU - Pace, Ugo
AU - Giandomenico, Francesca
AU - Pucciarelli, Salvatore
AU - Bianco, Francesco
AU - Selvaggi, Francesco
AU - Restivo, Angelo
AU - Asteria, Corrado Rosario
AU - Morpurgo, Emilio
AU - Cuicchi, Dajana
AU - Jovine, Elio
AU - Coletta, Diego
AU - La Torre, Giuseppe
AU - Amato, Antonio
AU - Chiappa, Antonio
AU - Marchegiani, Francesco
AU - Rega, Daniela
AU - De Franciscis, Silvia
AU - Pellino, Gianluca
AU - Zorcolo, Luigi
AU - Lotto, Lorella
AU - Boccia, Luigi
AU - Spolverato, Gaya
AU - De Salvo, Gian Luca
AU - Delrio, Paolo
AU - Del Bianco, Paola
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes associated with different bowel reconstruction techniques following anterior resection for rectal cancer are still a matter of debate. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess quality of life and bowel function in patients who underwent colonic J-pouch or straight colorectal anastomosis reconstruction after low anterior resection. DESIGN: Bowel function and quality of life were assessed within a multicenter randomized trial. Questionnaires were administered before the surgery (baseline) and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. SETTINGS: Patients were enrolled by 19 centers. The enrollment started in October 2009 and was stopped in February 2016. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01110798). PATIENTS: Patients who underwent low anterior resection for primary mid-low rectal cancer and who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either stapled colonic J-pouch or straight colorectal anastomosis were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were quality of life and bowel function. RESULTS: Of the 379 patients who were evaluable, 312 (82.3%) completed the baseline, 259 (68.3%) the 6-month, 242 (63.9%) the 12-month, and 199 (52.5%) the 24-month assessment. Bowel functioning and quality of life did not significantly differ between arms for almost all domains. The total bowel function score, the urgency, and the stool fractionation scores significantly worsened after surgery and remained impaired over time in both arms (p < 0.0032), whereas constipation improved after surgery but recovered to baseline levels from 1 year onward (p < 0.0036). All patients showed a significant and continuous improvement in emotional functioning (p < 0.0013) and future perspective (p < 0.0001) from baseline to the end of the study. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of the study include missing data, which increased over time; the possibility that some treatments have slightly changed since the study was conducted; and investigators not blind to treatment allocation. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study do not support the routine use of colonic J-pouch reconstruction in patients with rectal cancer who undergo a low anterior resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B328.
AB - BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes associated with different bowel reconstruction techniques following anterior resection for rectal cancer are still a matter of debate. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess quality of life and bowel function in patients who underwent colonic J-pouch or straight colorectal anastomosis reconstruction after low anterior resection. DESIGN: Bowel function and quality of life were assessed within a multicenter randomized trial. Questionnaires were administered before the surgery (baseline) and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. SETTINGS: Patients were enrolled by 19 centers. The enrollment started in October 2009 and was stopped in February 2016. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01110798). PATIENTS: Patients who underwent low anterior resection for primary mid-low rectal cancer and who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either stapled colonic J-pouch or straight colorectal anastomosis were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were quality of life and bowel function. RESULTS: Of the 379 patients who were evaluable, 312 (82.3%) completed the baseline, 259 (68.3%) the 6-month, 242 (63.9%) the 12-month, and 199 (52.5%) the 24-month assessment. Bowel functioning and quality of life did not significantly differ between arms for almost all domains. The total bowel function score, the urgency, and the stool fractionation scores significantly worsened after surgery and remained impaired over time in both arms (p < 0.0032), whereas constipation improved after surgery but recovered to baseline levels from 1 year onward (p < 0.0036). All patients showed a significant and continuous improvement in emotional functioning (p < 0.0013) and future perspective (p < 0.0001) from baseline to the end of the study. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of the study include missing data, which increased over time; the possibility that some treatments have slightly changed since the study was conducted; and investigators not blind to treatment allocation. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study do not support the routine use of colonic J-pouch reconstruction in patients with rectal cancer who undergo a low anterior resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B328.
KW - Bowel function
KW - J-pouch reconstruction
KW - Low anterior resection
KW - Patient-reported outcomes
KW - Quality of life
KW - Rectal cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092887257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001745
DO - 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001745
M3 - Article
C2 - 33044292
AN - SCOPUS:85092887257
SN - 0012-3706
VL - 63
SP - 1511
EP - 1523
JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
IS - 11
ER -