TY - JOUR
T1 - Choosing Aggregation Rules for Composite Indicators
AU - Munda, Giuseppe
PY - 2012/12/1
Y1 - 2012/12/1
N2 - From a formal point of view, a composite indicator is an aggregate of all dimensions, objectives, individual indicators and variables used for its construction. This implies that what defines a composite indicator is the set of properties underlying its mathematical aggregation convention. In this article, I try to revise the theoretical debate on aggregation rules by looking at contributions from both voting theory and multi-criteria decision analysis. This cross-fertilization helps in clarifying many ambiguous issues still present in the literature and allows discussing the key assumptions that may change the evaluation of an aggregation rule easily, when a composite indicator has to be constructed. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
AB - From a formal point of view, a composite indicator is an aggregate of all dimensions, objectives, individual indicators and variables used for its construction. This implies that what defines a composite indicator is the set of properties underlying its mathematical aggregation convention. In this article, I try to revise the theoretical debate on aggregation rules by looking at contributions from both voting theory and multi-criteria decision analysis. This cross-fertilization helps in clarifying many ambiguous issues still present in the literature and allows discussing the key assumptions that may change the evaluation of an aggregation rule easily, when a composite indicator has to be constructed. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
KW - Multi-criteria decision analysis
KW - Rational choice
KW - Voting paradoxes
U2 - 10.1007/s11205-011-9911-9
DO - 10.1007/s11205-011-9911-9
M3 - Article
SN - 0303-8300
VL - 109
SP - 337
EP - 354
JO - Social Indicators Research
JF - Social Indicators Research
IS - 3
ER -