TY - JOUR
T1 - Changing the intellectual climate
AU - Castree, Noel
AU - Adams, William M.
AU - Barry, John
AU - Brockington, Daniel
AU - Büscher, Bram
AU - Corbera, Esteve
AU - Demeritt, David
AU - Duffy, Rosaleen
AU - Felt, Ulrike
AU - Neves, Katja
AU - Newell, Peter
AU - Pellizzoni, Luigi
AU - Rigby, Kate
AU - Robbins, Paul
AU - Robin, Libby
AU - Rose, Deborah Bird
AU - Ross, Andrew
AU - Schlosberg, David
AU - Sörlin, Sverker
AU - West, Paige
AU - Whitehead, Mark
AU - Wynne, Brian
N1 - Funding Information:
N.C. acknowledges the Australian Centre for Cultural Environmental Research (AUSCCER) for supporting the conception and completion of this article. D.B. acknowledges the Economic and Social Research Council (awards RES 070-27-0035 and RES 000-27-0174) for supporting research generative of some ideas contained in this article. Finally, the authors thank M. Hulme for his assistance.
PY - 2014/9/11
Y1 - 2014/9/11
N2 - Calls for more broad-based, integrated, useful knowledge now abound in the world of global environmental change science. They evidence many scientists' desire to help humanity confront the momentous biophysical implications of its own actions. But they also reveal a limited conception of social science and virtually ignore the humanities. They thereby endorse a stunted conception of 'human dimensions' at a time when the challenges posed by global environmental change are increasing in magnitude, scale and scope. Here, we make the case for a richer conception predicated on broader intellectual engagement and identify some preconditions for its practical fulfilment. Interdisciplinary dialogue, we suggest, should engender plural representations of Earth's present and future that are reflective of divergent human values and aspirations. In turn, this might insure publics and decision-makers against overly narrow conceptions of what is possible and desirable as they consider the profound questions raised by global environmental change.© 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
AB - Calls for more broad-based, integrated, useful knowledge now abound in the world of global environmental change science. They evidence many scientists' desire to help humanity confront the momentous biophysical implications of its own actions. But they also reveal a limited conception of social science and virtually ignore the humanities. They thereby endorse a stunted conception of 'human dimensions' at a time when the challenges posed by global environmental change are increasing in magnitude, scale and scope. Here, we make the case for a richer conception predicated on broader intellectual engagement and identify some preconditions for its practical fulfilment. Interdisciplinary dialogue, we suggest, should engender plural representations of Earth's present and future that are reflective of divergent human values and aspirations. In turn, this might insure publics and decision-makers against overly narrow conceptions of what is possible and desirable as they consider the profound questions raised by global environmental change.© 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906880131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/nclimate2339
DO - 10.1038/nclimate2339
M3 - Review article
SN - 1758-678X
VL - 4
SP - 763
EP - 768
JO - Nature Climate Change
JF - Nature Climate Change
IS - 9
ER -