TY - JOUR
T1 - Baiting improves wild boar population size estimates by camera trapping
AU - Peris, Albert
AU - Closa-Sebastià, Francesc
AU - Marco, Ignasi
AU - Serrano, Emmanuel
AU - Casas-Díaz, Encarna
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - © 2019 In the last decade, camera trapping has become a widespread technique for wildlife monitoring. Although baits or attractants are commonly used to increase the likelihood of encounter, this practice has been criticised because of the potential biases in the population estimations based on these records obtained by mark-recapture or mark-resight methods, and especially in relative abundance indices (RAI). For two consecutive years, we evaluated the impact of baiting on wild boar (Sus scrofa) population estimates in a protected area of northeast Spain. In particular, we compared the number of boars per independent events (the group size), the estimated population size and RAI between periods with and without baiting. Baiting increased mean group size estimation and the likelihood of an encounter leading to more precise wild boar population estimates. The RAI values both at baited and unbaited campaigns correlated significantly with mark-resight abundance estimates, suggesting that these indices could be used to evaluate the boar population changes.
AB - © 2019 In the last decade, camera trapping has become a widespread technique for wildlife monitoring. Although baits or attractants are commonly used to increase the likelihood of encounter, this practice has been criticised because of the potential biases in the population estimations based on these records obtained by mark-recapture or mark-resight methods, and especially in relative abundance indices (RAI). For two consecutive years, we evaluated the impact of baiting on wild boar (Sus scrofa) population estimates in a protected area of northeast Spain. In particular, we compared the number of boars per independent events (the group size), the estimated population size and RAI between periods with and without baiting. Baiting increased mean group size estimation and the likelihood of an encounter leading to more precise wild boar population estimates. The RAI values both at baited and unbaited campaigns correlated significantly with mark-resight abundance estimates, suggesting that these indices could be used to evaluate the boar population changes.
KW - Mark-resight
KW - Population estimation
KW - Relative abundance index
KW - Sus scrofa
KW - Wildlife monitoring
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/baiting-improves-wild-boar-population-size-estimates-camera-trapping
U2 - 10.1016/j.mambio.2019.07.005
DO - 10.1016/j.mambio.2019.07.005
M3 - Article
SN - 1616-5047
VL - 98
SP - 28
EP - 35
JO - Mammalian Biology
JF - Mammalian Biology
ER -