@article{8f60011646044053996e07da6a634df3,
title = "Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment",
abstract = "We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice. {\textcopyright} 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.",
keywords = "Colonisation, Exotic, Habitat suitability, Life history trait, Non-indigenous, Policy, Propagule pressure, Risk analysis, Species distribution, Uncertainty",
author = "Brian Leung and Nuria Roura-Pascual and Sven Bacher and Jaakko Heikkil{\"a} and Lluis Brotons and Burgman, {Mark A.} and Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz and Franz Essl and Hulme, {Philip E.} and Richardson, {David M.} and Daniel Sol and Montserrat Vil{\`a}",
year = "2013",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ele.12172",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
number = "11",
}