A quantitative comparison of methods for classifying burned areas with LISS-III imagery

Keyphrases

• Burned Area 100%
• Method Comparison 100%
• Reflectance Data 100%
• Decision Tree Classifier 100%
• LISS III Imagery 100%
• Spain 50%
• Fire Effects 50%
• Costing Methods 50%
• Poor Performance 50%
• Image Processing Techniques 50%
• Satellite-based 50%
• Large Fires 50%
• Vegetation Index 50%
• Bare Soil 50%
• Fast Evaluation 50%
• Overall Accuracy 50%
• Accurate Method 50%
• Spectral Characteristics 50%
• Environmental Agency 50%
• Remote Sensing Techniques 50%
• Spectral Unmixing 50%
• Large Forest Fires 50%
• Partial Contribution 50%
• Mixed Area 50%
• Reflectance Spectral 50%
• IRS LISS-III 50%
• Data Unmixing 50%

Earth and Planetary Sciences

• LISS 100%
• Purity 100%
• Field Survey 66%
• Reflectance 66%
• Vegetation Index 33%
• Bare Soil 33%
• Forest Fire 33%
• Spectral Unmixing 33%
• Spain 33%
• Vegetation 33%
• Image Processing 33%
• Remote Sensing 33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

• Purity 100%
• Forest Fire 33%
• Vegetation Index 33%
• Remote Sensing 33%