TY - JOUR
T1 - A new critical social science research agenda on pesticides
AU - Mansfield, Becky
AU - Werner, Marion
AU - Berndt, Christian
AU - Shattuck, Annie
AU - Galt, Ryan
AU - Williams, Bryan
AU - Argüelles, Lucía
AU - Barri, Fernando Rafael
AU - Ishii, Marcia
AU - Kunin, Johana
AU - Lapegna, Pablo
AU - Romero, Adam
AU - Caicedo, Andres
AU - Abhigya,
AU - Castro-Vargas, María Soledad
AU - Marquez, Emily
AU - Ojeda, Diana
AU - Ramirez, Fernando
AU - Tittor, Anne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/8/10
Y1 - 2023/8/10
N2 - The global pesticide complex has transformed over the past two decades, but social science research has not kept pace. The rise of an enormous generics sector, shifts in geographies of pesticide production, and dynamics of agrarian change have led to more pesticide use, expanding to farm systems that hitherto used few such inputs. Declining effectiveness due to pesticide resistance and anemic institutional support for non-chemical alternatives also have driven intensification in conventional systems. As an inter-disciplinary network of pesticide scholars, we seek to renew the social science research agenda on pesticides to better understand this suite of contemporary changes. To identify research priorities, challenges, and opportunities, we develop the pesticide complex as a heuristic device to highlight the reciprocal and iterative interactions among agricultural practice, the agrochemical industry, civil society-shaped regulatory actions, and contested knowledge of toxicity. Ultimately, collaborations among social scientists and across the social and biophysical sciences can illuminate recent transformations and their uneven socioecological effects. A reinvigorated critical scholarship that embraces the multifaceted nature of pesticides can identify the social and ecological constraints that drive pesticide use and support alternatives to chemically driven industrial agriculture.
AB - The global pesticide complex has transformed over the past two decades, but social science research has not kept pace. The rise of an enormous generics sector, shifts in geographies of pesticide production, and dynamics of agrarian change have led to more pesticide use, expanding to farm systems that hitherto used few such inputs. Declining effectiveness due to pesticide resistance and anemic institutional support for non-chemical alternatives also have driven intensification in conventional systems. As an inter-disciplinary network of pesticide scholars, we seek to renew the social science research agenda on pesticides to better understand this suite of contemporary changes. To identify research priorities, challenges, and opportunities, we develop the pesticide complex as a heuristic device to highlight the reciprocal and iterative interactions among agricultural practice, the agrochemical industry, civil society-shaped regulatory actions, and contested knowledge of toxicity. Ultimately, collaborations among social scientists and across the social and biophysical sciences can illuminate recent transformations and their uneven socioecological effects. A reinvigorated critical scholarship that embraces the multifaceted nature of pesticides can identify the social and ecological constraints that drive pesticide use and support alternatives to chemically driven industrial agriculture.
KW - Global pesticide complex
KW - Pesticide industry
KW - Pesticide regulation
KW - Pesticide social science research agenda
KW - Pesticide toxicity
KW - Pesticides
KW - Global pesticide complex
KW - Pesticide industry
KW - Pesticide regulation
KW - Pesticide social science research agenda
KW - Pesticide toxicity
KW - Pesticides
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85167657426
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/01298bd4-513a-3fe1-a360-22af1b130c81/
U2 - 10.1007/s10460-023-10492-w
DO - 10.1007/s10460-023-10492-w
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85167657426
SN - 0889-048X
JO - Agriculture and Human Values
JF - Agriculture and Human Values
ER -