Saltar a la navegació principal
Saltar a la cerca
Vés al contingut principal
Portal de Recerca de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Inici
Ajuda i PMF
L'enllaç s'obre en una pestanya nova
Català
Español
English
Cerca contingut a Portal de Recerca de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Inici
Perfils
Unitats de recerca
Projectes
Producció científica
Conjunts de dades
Tesis i Treballs supervisats
Valoración del riesgo de sesgo en revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis de estudios evaluativos de intervenciones complejas
Losilla Vidal, Jose Maria
(Investigador/a principal)
Casellas Grau, Anna
(Col.laborador/a)
Lorente Sànchez, Sònia
(Col.laborador/a)
Oliveras Bote, Isabel
(Col.laborador/a)
López González, Emelina
(Investigador/a)
Marín García, Juan Antonio
(Investigador/a)
Rodrigo Giménez, Maria Florencia
(Investigador/a)
Vives Brosa, Jaume
(Investigador/a)
Departament de Psicobiologia i Metodologia de les Ciències de la Salut
Universitat de València (UV)
Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
Informació general
Fingerprint
Producció científica
(13)
Fingerprint
Explora els temes de recerca tractats en aquest projecte. Les etiquetes es generen en funció dels ajuts rebuts. Juntes formen un fingerprint únic.
Ordenar per
Ponderació
Alfabèticament
Keyphrases
Sexting
60%
High Reliability Organizations
30%
Social Anxiety
30%
Laterality
30%
Organizational Subcultures
30%
Mentalizing
30%
In Cancer
30%
Socio-educational
30%
Daily Life
30%
Quality of Life Instruments
30%
High School Students
30%
Meta-review
30%
Life Events
30%
Socio-emotional Skills
30%
Stress Management
30%
GHQ-12
30%
Randomized Controlled Trial
30%
Media Formats
30%
Hand-eye
30%
Posttraumatic Growth
30%
Cancer Survivors
30%
Scoping Review Protocol
30%
Negatively Worded Items
30%
Three-level Meta-analysis
30%
Method Effects
30%
General Health Questionnaire-12
30%
University Students
30%
Measurement Properties
30%
Sports Performance
30%
Sexual Content
24%
Positive Psychotherapy
21%
Prevalence Estimates
20%
Meta-analysis
20%
Risk of Bias
19%
Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms
17%
Bibliographic Databases
15%
Three-level
15%
Text Messaging
15%
Measurement Instrument
15%
Self-functioning
15%
Social Cognition
15%
COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN)
15%
Emotional Response
15%
Underwear
15%
Mental States
13%
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management
12%
Method Factors
12%
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)
12%
Social Functioning
12%
Scoping Review
12%
Mentalization
10%
Mixed Effects
9%
Media Content
9%
Social Media Networks
9%
Set Inclusion
9%
High Prevalence
9%
Nude
9%
Probabilistic Sample
9%
Live Streaming
9%
Moderation Analysis
9%
Online Media
9%
Sexual Images
9%
Subgroup Analysis
9%
Increasing Prevalence
9%
Inclusion Criteria
9%
Safety Performance
9%
Competing Goals
9%
High Reliability Organization Theory
9%
Eysenck Personality Questionnaire
7%
Non-associated
7%
Deep Comprehension
7%
Global Measures
7%
Fast Recovery
7%
Trait Meta-Mood Scale
7%
Socioeconomic Status
7%
Emotional Distress
7%
Neuroticism
7%
TMMS-24
7%
Everyday Life
7%
Life Stress
7%
Multivariate Regression Model
7%
Scopus
6%
University Education
6%
Working Conditions
6%
Effective Service
6%
Demographic Covariates
6%
Valuable Insight
6%
Social Competence
6%
Cross-sectional Observational Study
6%
Highest Clarity
6%
Self-esteem
6%
Sociometric Status
6%
General Health Questionnaire
6%
Factorial Structure
6%
Personal Well-being
6%
Spain
6%
Unidimensional Model
6%
Job Success
6%
Best Model
6%
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
6%
Catalonia
6%
Confirmatory Factor Model
6%
Competencies
6%
Crossed Hands
5%
Standardized Measurement
5%
Sexual Explicitness
5%
Voice Call
5%
Girlfriends
5%
Audio Message
5%
Romantic Partners
5%
Secondary School Students
5%
World Wide Web
5%
Convenience Sampling
5%
Scientific Tradition
5%
Organizational Culture Inventory
5%
Culture Survey
5%
Health-related Quality of Life
5%
Quality Measures
5%
CINAHL
5%
Poor Compliance
5%
Intended Use
5%
Review Process
5%
ProQuest
5%
Adherence to Guidelines
5%
Methodological Quality
5%
Measurement Standards
5%
Reporting Quality
5%
Reporting Guidelines
5%
Consensus-based
5%
Review Quality
5%
Methodological Research
5%
Health Measurement
5%
Comprehensive Evaluation
5%
Methodological Guidelines
5%
Prospero
5%
Google Scholar
5%
Methodological Shortcomings
5%
PubMed
5%
Electronic Search
5%
PsycINFO
5%
Psychology
Systematic Review
100%
Measurement Instrument
50%
Laterality
30%
Voice Call
30%
Social Anxiety
30%
Scoping Review
30%
Posttraumatic Growth
30%
Quality of Life
30%
Ecological Momentary Assessment
30%
Life Event
30%
Physical Activity
30%
High School Student
30%
Meta-Analysis
30%
MHealth
30%
General Health Questionnaire
30%
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
24%
Social Cognition
18%
Mental State
17%
Individual Differences
15%
Factor Analysis
15%
Mentalization
13%
Neuroticism
9%
Media Content
9%
Moderator Analysis
9%
Regression Model
9%
Eysenck
9%
Emotional Distress
9%
Mood
9%
Multivariate Regression
9%
Mobile Phones
7%
Social Functioning
7%
Self-Esteem
7%
Social Competence
7%